25 aprile 2012

BPCO e Insufficienza Respiratoria: Strategie Terapeutiche Innovative. Se ne discute sabato 19 Maggio presso la Clinica Athena-Villa dei Pini

PIEDIMONTE MATESE. La BPCO - Broncopneumopatia Cronica Ostruttiva- è una malattia polmonare progressiva, solo parzialmente reversibile con opportuni trattamenti farmacologici. La BPCO ostruisce le vie aeree, riduce la capacità respiratoria, rendendo difficoltosa la respirazione. Pazienti con BPCO, inclusi quelli con bronchite cronica ed enfisema, mostrano sintomi che vanno da tosse ed espettorato a mancanza di fiato durante sforzi anche modesti, persino camminare. Il fattore di rischio più importante nella BPCO è il fumo di sigaretta, ma anche quello di pipa, sigaro, e altri tipi di tabacco; il fumo passivo contribuisce all’insorgenza della BPCO e allo scatenarsi dei sintomi. Secondo le stime fornite dall’Organizzazione Mondiale della Sanità, la malattia colpisce nel mondo 210 milioni di persone (250 persone ogni ora), in Italia circa 3 milioni di persone, di cui risultano 62mila in ossigenoterapia e 20mila in ventilazione assistita. Nel 2030, secondo i dati OMS, sarà la terza causa di morte nel mondo e nel 2020 la quinta causa in termini di disabilità e qualità di vita.  Il Workshop su "BPCO e Insufficienza Respiratoria: Strategie Terapeutiche Innovative"  che si terrà Sabato 19 Maggio 2012, a partire alle 8.45, presso la sala congressi della Clinica Athena-Villa dei Pini di Piedimonte Matese ha, pertanto, l’obiettivo di presentare la situazione attuale e proporre nuovi schemi di gestione della BPCO. Il Convegno cercherà di fornire un quadro generale sulla problematica clinica e proporre nuovi schemi e strategie di gestione della BPCO. "La BPCO è una malattia prevenibile e curabile, sebbene ancora sotto diagnosticata, sottostimata e sotto trattata - illustra il Dott. Luigi Ferritto, pneumologo della struttura sanitaria matesina - Per la sua natura progressiva è solo parzialmente reversibile con adeguate terapie farmacologiche e può associarsi alla frequente presenza di comorbilità (cardiologiche, infettive, osteoporosi, neurologiche…). Quest’anno nel programma del convegno abbiamo cercato di inserire comunicazioni che toccassero globalmente tale patologia, dalla fisiopatologia alla terapia, dalle comorbilità al rapporto tra paziente e medico di famiglia. Non mancherà la presentazione di casi clinici".  "La BPCO è una malattia cronica complessa che colpisce bronchi e polmoni, causata da sostanze inquinanti, prima tra tutte il fumo di sigaretta" - spiega il Prof. Pasqualino Simonelli Presidente della Clinica Athena-Villa dei Pini" - "Salva il tuo Respiro, il nostro slogan, significa mantenere il proprio respiro come bene prezioso. Per questo è importante la conoscenza della malattia, la prevenzione e le terapia adeguata per rendere migliore la qualità della vita del paziente".  Tale Workshop si rivolge ai medici, ai farmacisti, agli operatori sociali e sanitari, ma anche ai pazienti e alle loro famiglie affinché sostengano questa iniziativa e contribuiscano a migliorare l'informazione e la gestione della BPCO.

Pietro Rossi

Approvato il progetto per il completamento del fabbricato da adibire a centro polifunzionale.


Francesco Imperadore
SAN POTITO SANNITICO.  Con la Delibera N. 45 del 13.04.2012 l’amministrazione comunale di San Potito Sannitico, guidata da Francesco Imperadore, ha approvato  il progetto preliminare dei lavori di completamento del fabbricato ex asilo di proprietà comunale da adibire a Centro Polifunzionale per l’importo complessivo di euro 200.000,00. Programmare la crescita sostenibile del paese, ha ribadito il Sindaco di San Potito Sannitico Francesco Imperadore, coniugando sviluppo economico e coesione sociale è stato uno dei punti cardini della nostra campagna elettorale ed è con questo progetto che la nostra amministrazione cercherà di far crescere il benessere dei cittadini migliorando la qualità della vita, offrendo servizi e buone ragioni per vivere bene nel proprio paese. La spesa prevista, di complessive euro 200.000,00, verrà finanziata con mutuo da contrarre con la Cassa Depositi e prestiti per euro 40.000,00 e per euro 160.000,00 con fondi regionali.

Pietro Rossi

SECONDA GIORNATA “ADOTTA UN CANE E SARETE FELICI INSIEME”


Piedimonte Matese. La legge 281 del 1991 che doveva eliminare il randagismo ha fallito. At­tribuiva ai comuni la re­sponsabilità di costruire e gestire canili adeguati, ridurre il numero dei randagi attraverso la sterilizzazione e favorire le adozi­oni. Ma nonostante siano passati ormai quasi vent’anni sono anco­ra tanti i cani senza padrone, dei quali 150mila chiusi nei cani­li. A seguito del successo riscosso dalla prima Giornata dell’iniziativa “Adotta un cane e sarete felici insieme”, l’Amministrazione comunale di Piedimonte Matese in collaborazione con il Rifugio Mascherina, l’Associazione Animal’s Friends e i volontari del rifugio, presenta la seconda Giornata di Adozioni in Piazza V. Cappello DOMENICA 29 Aprile a partire dalle ore 9:00. Presenti i veterinari dell’ASL 1 Caserta e lo stand per la firma delle adozioni a distanza pubblicizzate attraverso il web con una singolare provocazione che i volontari hanno inviato ai candidati alle prossime elezioni comunali: UN CANDIDATO PER UN CANE è la proposta  AI SIGNORI CANDIDATI DI PIEDIMONTE E DINTORNI: DIMOSTRATECI DI VOLER CONTRIBUIRE AL BENESSERE DEL PAESE ANCHE CON LE PRATICHE DI SOLIDARIETA': ADOTTATE A DISTANZA UN CANE DEL VOSTRO RIFUGIO.

Pietro Rossi

MERCATO MEDIOEVALE DELLE CROCIATE AL CASTELLO DI LIMATOLA

MERCATO MEDIOEVALE DELLE CROCIATE AL CASTELLO DI LIMATOLA
29-30 APRILE E 1 MAGGIO 2012
RIEVOCAZIONE STORICA
DEGUSTAZIONE DELLE SPECIALITA’ DELLA CUCINA MEDIEVALE
CAVALIERI: OPERE DI RICCARDO DALISI IN MOSTRA
ALL’INTERNO: RISTORANTE, BAR, SELF SERVICE, BARBECUE, PUNTI RISTORO
INGRESSO € 3,00 (1 CONSUMAZIONE OMAGGIO)
PER INFO 0823.484143

MODERN TRENDS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW IN THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN.


Anna Polin
Master TSIL.
MODERN TRENDS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW IN THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN.
      Among the important factors of economic development in countries with economies in transition are the creation and implementation of new technologies based on the achievements of world science and technology. Problems related to legal protection, use and evaluation of intellectual property in its commercial applications are new to the Republic of Uzbekistan has chosen a path of renewal and progress[1].
        The transformations in Uzbekistan initiated after independence, significantly influenced the development of the country's science, engineering and technology. Today Uzbekistan is a major research center with a good research base and its own scientific world-class schools. Developed a fundamentally new approach to economic growth and technological development, based on the expansion of international economic relations and integration into the global economic system. The main conditions for such integration is an effective system of legal protection for innovation and commercialization, as well as the development of intellectual property market.
              In the anti-crisis program of measures developed on the initiative of President Islam Karimov and consistently implemented, special attention is paid to the modernization of enterprises, further enhancing their technical and technological re-equipment, the widespread introduction of modern and adaptable technology. These problems, of course, associated with the development of innovation and its effective implementation in practice.
Thus, for this purpose was accepted by the President "On additional measures to stimulate innovative projects and technologies in production"[2].
      Western analysts are paying attention and interest developed in Uzbekistan with the principles and approaches of the development of innovative processes in a transition economy, which in the future, can be successfully applied in practice in other countries. Aroused such interest among the Western scientific world reports of Uzbek scientists as Professor Mamajanova H.[3], Professor A. Asimov[4], Dr. A. Ibragimov[5], in which they reveal the actual problems in the field of protection and valuation of intellectual property.
       Given the specificity of the national economy and international experience developed an original mechanism of regulation of innovation processes[6]. On this basis, the State Science and Technology Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan jointly with industry bodies formed a number of scientific and industrial centers of innovation for the creation and development of advanced high technologies involving experts from research institutes and universities.
        Development of Intellectual Property was due to the need to attract the country's economy the most advanced domestic and foreign technologies, the formation of small and medium businesses. Small and medium-sized businesses, producing products based on innovation, the government has provided great benefits, including tax[7].
      Since 1993, Uzbekistan is a member of the World Intellectual Property Organization and acceded to key international conventions and agreements in this area, as the Convention establishing WIPO[8], Paris Convention[9], Berne Convention[10], Madrid Agreement[11], the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)[12], Treaty Trademark Law (TLT)[13]; Budapest Treaty[14], the Nice Agreement[15], the Strasbourg Agreement[16].
       In March 2006 the laws on Uzbekistan's accession to the Patent Law Treaty[17] and the Locarno Agreement[18], which will contribute to the protection of domestic developments abroad and externally - the economic activity of exporters, as well as attracting foreign investment in the national industry.
        The process of globalization of the economy of the Republic of Uzbekistan today compels to work together, as the commercialization of innovation across the global markets is impossible without the development of common approaches to the protection and intellectual property valuation, to work with patents and licensing trade. Also, due to the fact that intellectual property has great potential as a powerful instrument of economic development, especially for the current economy, based on knowledge[19]. That is why the protection of intellectual property today is an urgent problem in the world and has become not just a legal or business matter, but the question of an economic nature.
As a result of a comprehensive intellectualization of the modern world economy, this problem becomes the problem of macro-economic scale, and requires a strategic approach to its solution. It is important to bear in mind that has already formed a global regulatory framework for intellectual property protection. The solution of the problem of creating an effective system of intellectual property protection, durability depends on the foundation of an innovative development model of Uzbekistan, its modernization and competitiveness in the global economic system, as well as prospects for job creation in new industries. In turn, this is a question of a civilized market environment in which entrepreneurs, and consumers would be protected from unfair competition related to the misuse of intellectual property, production of counterfeit goods.
      The main priority of the Government in this area is a reliable protection of the interests of owners of intellectual property rights.




[1] www.patent.uz.
[2] Resolution of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On additional measures to stimulate innovative projects and technologies in production" on July 15, 2008, № 916.
[3] Mamajanova JM status and prospects of development of legal frameworks and methodological approaches to the evaluation of intellectual property. (Center for project analysis and market research). www.cps.uz.
[4] Asimov's Strategy of the State Intellectual Property Protection in the Republic of Uzbekistan (State Patent Office). www.patent.uz.
[5] A. Ibragimov commercialization of high technologies in Uzbekistan: practice and problems, (Agency Technology Transfer). www.ieguzexpo.com
[6] The process of creation, development and diffusion of innovation is innovation or the innovation process.
[7] www.cagateway.org
[8] Convention Establishing the World Intellectual Property Organization, ot14 July 1967 (amended October 2, 1979), Stockholm.
[9] The Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property of March 20, 1883 (revised: in Brussels, December 14, 1900, in Washington, June 2, 1911, in The Hague, November 6, 1925, in London June 2, 1934, in Lisbon, 31 October 1958 and in Stockholm on July 14, 1967, and amended October 2, 1979 October 2, 1979 g)
[10]  Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works of September 9, 1886 (completed at Paris on 4 May 1896, revised at Berlin on November 13, 1908, completed at Berne, March 20, 1914 and revised in Rome on June 2, 1928, in Brussels, June 26, 1948, in Stockholm, July 14, 1967 in Paris, July 24, 1971, as amended September 28, 1979).
[11]   Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks of April 14, 1891. (Revised in Brussels on December 14, 1900, in Washington on June 2, 1911. In The Hague, November 6, 1925, in London on June 2, 1934, in Nice on June 15, 1957 city, and at Stockholm on July 14, 1967).
[12] The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) on June 19, 1970 (revised October 2, 1979 and 3 February 1984), Washington, DC.
[13] The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) on June 19, 1970 (revised October 2, 1979 and 3 February 1984), Washington, DC.
[14] Budapest Treaty on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Microorganisms for the Purposes of Patent Procedure, April 28, 1977, Budapest.
[15] Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Registration of Marks of June 15, 1957, Nice (as revised at Stockholm on July 14, 1967 and is being in Geneva May 13, 1977).
[16] Strasbourg Agreement Concerning the International Patent Classification of March 24, 1971, Strasbourg.
[17] Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan on the accession of the Republic of Uzbekistan to the Patent Law Treaty, adopted by the Diplomatic Conference on June 1, 2000. in Geneva from March 15, 2006, N-LRU 25.
[18]  Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan on the accession of the Republic of Uzbekistan to the Locarno Agreement Establishing an International Classification for Industrial Designs, signed at Locarno on 8 October 1967., On March 11, 2006
[19] www.unescap.org


Anna Polin
Master TSIL.
The most relevant aspects of intellectual property market in the Republic of Uzbekistan

          Uzbekistan currently has a policy, part of which is the creation of intellectual property market.
         The most relevant aspects of intellectual property market are reduced to the following issues:
            Uzbekistan is negotiating to join the WTO. In this regard, especially the most important is to be ensure in the protection of intellectual property rights.
        Since independence, in the Republic of Uzbekistan has been greatly developed legal framework in the field of public relations. Adopted a number of fundamental laws, a system of regulations, which implements them in practice, and this reflects the issues of copyright, neighboring rights, industrial property, trademarks and other intellectual property rights[1]. In addition, based on the legal framework in the field of intellectual property protection on the following principles[2]:
 - The priority of international law and international treaties of the Republic of Uzbekistan;
- Equality between foreign and domestic applicants;
- Free choice of the States in which protection is sought;
- The action of a certain territory, and for a specified period;
- Consolidation of priority (12 months);
- The free disposal of exclusive rights.
Moreover, the Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On foreign investments and guarantees for foreign investors" defines legal, organizational and economic framework for the use, along with financial and material resources of foreign investors, the results of their intellectual and creative activity, modern foreign technologies and managerial expertise to promote economic development Republic of Uzbekistan, its integration into the global economy[3].
      Nowadays are developed a number of changes to existing legislation that will strengthen the protection of the interests of owners of intellectual property rights. This will also facilitate the process of accession of Uzbekistan to the World Trade Organization[4].
Uzbek law also provides exceptional protection (property or economic) rights of the holder of intellectual property, which are expressed in the law to use this object of intellectual property at its discretion, in any form. The use by others of intellectual property rights in respect of which the holder has the exclusive right is permitted only with the consent of the copyright holder.
The legislation contained sanctions and for infringement of intellectual property rights. Violation of copyright and patent rights in accordance with Article 149 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan is referred to crimes against the constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens. Attribution of authorship, forced into co-authorship of intellectual property, the disclosure of information without the consent of the author of these facilities prior to their official registration or publication shall be punished by a fine, deprivation of certain rights, corrective labor or arrest.
Other criminal sanctions plan could be applied in cases of willful violations of intellectual property. These are the cases of repeated and continuous violation of the rights of intellectual property, where economic sanctions have been exhausted. In such cases, the victim has the right to prosecute the offender under the law[5].
There are criminal sanctions against the collection of confidential scientific and technical, production and economic information, and any such information without the consent of the owner of this information[6].  Do not discredit a competitor through the dissemination of false, inaccurate or distorted information about him to harm his reputation[7].
These provisions of the Civil and Criminal Codes of the Republic of Uzbekistan have important economic and legal significance in assessing the adequacy regime for the protection of intellectual property rights in terms of the TRIPS (Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights), as the protection of property rights holders and the recognition of their uniqueness is the main aspect of this agreement[8] .
Agreement on intellectual property rights related to trade (TRIPS) requires compliance with rules and regulations of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, the Rome Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organizations[9] and the Agreement on Intellectual Property for integrated circuits[10].
     In this regard, the basic requirement of the WTO in this area is the fulfillment of basic requirements of the above conventions and agreements, the cornerstone of which is the obligation of countries to provide national treatment to foreign holders of intellectual property. TRIPS protects a wide range of rights holders.
    In this respect the legislation of Uzbekistan to expand and specify the rights of holders of intellectual property rights to be protected as their exclusive rights. The disadvantage of the system of protection of intellectual property rights in the country under the TRIPS standards are the lack of clearly defined procedures necessary for the protection of intellectual property rights and against their violation. This applies, above all, administrative and criminal legislation and associated procedural rules, the system of border control.
Based on the foregoing, it should also be noted that in the protection of intellectual property rights is necessary to clearly provide for border measures nature carried out by the customs authorities, as well as measures available to right holders whose rights are infringed upon the importation of counterfeit goods.
Under TRIPS, Member States shall provide for criminal penalties in cases of trademark counterfeiting and copyright piracy. For other types of intellectual property of a country can impose criminal penalties in cases where the wrongful acts committed intentionally and carried out "on a commercial scale." Article 149 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan aimed at protecting the moral rights of authors and inventors (forced co-authorship, attribution of authorship).
In addition, under the WTO will need to implement an increase in penalties for violations of such rights in order to ensure an adequate retribution for the damage, the introduction of rules on administrative responsibility for violation of intellectual property rights.
The above problems have to be addressed not only Uzbekistan itself, but all the countries involved in the modernization and rapid economic development are responsible of resolution of these problems has not led to slow the momentum of economic development, it is advisable to consider the introduction of the so-called "transition period" for use the legislation on intellectual property in the process of joining republic of Uzbekistan into the WTO.


[1] The Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan (Article 42) / / Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On Property in the Republic of Uzbekistan" dated 31.10.1990, the, № 152-XII / / The Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On inventions, utility models and industrial designs" on May 6, 1994 , N 1062-XII / / The Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On legal Protection of Topographies of Integrated Circuits" on May 12, 2001 N 218-II / / Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "on legal protection of software for electronic computers and databases" on May 6 1994 N 1060-XII / / The Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "on Trademarks and service name of origin" on August 30, 2001 N 267-II / / Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "on Copyright and related Rights" on August 30, 1996 , № 272-I / / Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On selection Achievements" on August 30, 1996 N 270-I.
[2] www.patent.uz.
[3] www.unescap.org
[4] Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On foreign investments and guarantees for foreign investors" from 05.05.94 g, N 1052-XII
[5] Article 174 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
[6] Article 191 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
[7] Article 192 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
[8] TRIPS - the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (The Tacis Programme - Intellectual Property Presented by the Delegation of the European Commission in Russia, December 2001).
[9] Rome Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organizations of 26 October 1967, Rome.
[10] Agreement on Intellectual Property for the integrated circuits on May 26, 1989, Washington, DC.


Anna Polin
Master TSIL.

Prospects for the introduction of the institute summary proceedings to the legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan.

The objectives of the criminal proceedings under Article 2 of the CPC of the Republic of Uzbekistan are:
- Rapid and full disclosure of crimes;
- Expose the perpetrators;
- Ensuring the correct application of the law so that everyone who commits a crime, was subjected to a just punishment and no innocent person has been prosecuted and convicted.
In addition, the established criminal-procedural legislation of the procedure in criminal cases should help to strengthen the rule of law, prevent crime, protect the interests of the individual, the state and society.
The above problems are solved sometimes by the use of coercive measures against the persons suspected, accused, defendants and other parties to the proceedings, it does not always apply the measures have a positive result for the warring parties. For example, at the end of the trial, the defendant does not agree with the verdict of the court, or vice versa the victim does not agree with the sentence, etc. On the other side of the criminal process struggling with such anti-social phenomenon as a crime, uses rigorous methods and techniques at a resolution of criminal cases is justified. However, in practice, it became possible to resolve the dispute through "agreement" the parties. As we know, in practice, such "agreement" of the opposing sides seen with the Institute of reconciliation. In many countries, as noted above, the agreement of the opposing sides can be seen with the consent of the accused to the indictment (Spain, France, Italy, Germany, USA, Russian Federation (since 2001))[1], and other countries, although the order of application of this form of justice is different, its essence lies in the fact that, with the consent of the prosecutor, the victim, the accused (with the assistance of counsel), acknowledging his guilt, the request for summary judgment proceeding in which, absent a judicial investigation and the judge passes sentence of punishment. Is it possible to impart this institution in our legislation?
Traditionally, the Republic of Uzbekistan resolution of criminal proceedings in a court of first instance in a general way sequentially through several stages (preparatory part of the hearing, the judicial investigation, pleadings, the defendant's last word, and so on). Each stage requires strict compliance with procedural requirements prescribed in the relevant rules of criminal procedure.
Here is an example. So during the trial questioned the accused and the victim, witnesses and experts who examined the evidence. If necessary, other legal actions are made. Moreover, these actions the court shall, regardless of whether the defendant contests his guilt or he fully agrees with the charges against him. This cumbersome and complicated procedure for judicial resolution of criminal cases, not only requires significant material cost of the state, but also severely limits the ability to "timely" in criminal cases by the courts, leading to a systematic violation of due process of consideration by the judges and the resolution of criminal cases, the diversion of a large number of people (witnesses professionals, victims, experts, etc.) from the basic work for a period of consideration by the court of criminal proceedings. But the simplification of the proceedings may not in all cases, as, for example, complex criminal cases or particularly grave crimes thorough observance of this procedure is justified because it promotes respect for the principles of lawfulness, fairness, objectivity and validity of decisions taken by the court, the rights and lawful interests of individuals and organizations, victims of crime, protecting the individual from unlawful and unreasonable charges, etc.
What has been said in any case does not mean that the simplification of the proceedings on certain categories of cases, compliance with these principles does not occur. Court with the consent of the parties may, without causing damage to the rule of law and justice, reasonableness and fairness, the final decision, and without complying with certain procedural requirements, often wearing formal. Institute for simplified proceedings originated long ago, was in many countries, legislative strengthening. Since the legislation of many countries (Russia, USA and other European countries[2]) regulates the grounds and conditions under which a court may decide on the case of a sentence without trial in a general manner, the simplified procedure of legal proceedings. According to article 314 of chapter 40 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (hereinafter - the Code), if the defendant committed the crime, the punishment for which is in accordance with the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation does not exceed 10 years in prison, and not contesting the charges against him, filed a motion on the application for a special order of the trial, the judge with the consent of the public (private), the prosecutor and the victim and there are reasons and conditions set forth in the rules of chapter 40 of the Code shall be entitled to decide on such a case the verdict without trial in a general way.
It should be noted, a special procedure for trial, represents a new Criminal Procedure Institute, aimed at simplifying the procedures for judicial review and resolution of criminal cases in particular categories of cases. Use of this institution of criminal procedure allows us to solve some problems[3]:
- To save power and money of criminal justice officials to investigate crimes and criminal proceedings for certain categories of cases;
- To persuade the accused (defendant) to cooperate with the criminal prosecution and use it to expose the crimes of other participants, quickly and with minimal cost to solve a crime, to establish all the circumstances of its commission, etc. - to reduce the gap in time from the date of the offense to making a final decision;
- To streamline the criminal proceedings, to make the process less time-consuming and more efficient.
The above list shows the tasks that the basis of a special institution of the order of the trial based on the idea, as pointed out by Rybalov KA "A reasonable compromise in criminal proceedings." What is expressed in such a compromise? In the simplified production legislator guarantees the accused (defendant) significant concessions in exchange for a commission of certain positive actions. Thus, in accordance with Art. of Art. 314-316 of the Code, if the defendant committed the crime of slight, moderate or heavy, during the preliminary investigation has pleaded guilty to the crime and does not challenge the charges against him, the court on the basis of his application and with the consent of the parties shall consider the case of a simplified procedure for the trial and assigns the punishment the defendant, not exceeding two thirds the size of the maximum term or the most severe penalty under the relevant rule of the Criminal Code.
Externally Institute special order making the judgment is similar to the "plea bargain" that exists in the Anglo-Saxon law, but they are fundamentally different from each other. Comparative analysis of the legislation of foreign states, which contain the rules laid down the "plea bargain", held in their articles, Stephen Teyman. He explored similar procedures available in Spain, France, Italy, Germany, the USA and came to the conclusion that the basic idea embodied in the "plea bargain" is a shortening and simplifying the investigation of the case study forms of evidence[4].
The problem of summary judgment scientists - show interest, and among them there are both opponents and supporters. In my opinion, the use of the Institute of Criminal Procedure as a simplified legal proceedings with the consent of the accused with the accusation against him is aimed at improving the efficiency of criminal prosecution, and the efficiency is determined by how well and timely manner possible to protect the rights and lawful interests of citizens to ensure equity, social stability and legitimacy of the state. In addition, the Institute promotes the expansion of early dispositive in criminal proceedings, giving the accused the right to exercise discretion and to express their will. Given the above, we can conclude that there need to conduct prospective studies aimed at creating a new institution of summary judgment proceedings in order to improve our criminal procedure law.
To date, it is no secret that the courts are very busy due to the large number of cases, the use of simplified forms of the same procedure will reduce the load of ships, but this goal is not paramount. Of course the main purpose is to protect human rights and freedoms, regardless of what party he is a criminal trial. By choosing the path of building a democratic state and strong civil society, we thus recognize that the highest value is human, his rights and freedoms. By providing the right to request a summary judgment, discretionary increases the criminal process, which is expressed in the accused the right to exercise discretion and to express their will.
There is a scientific opinion that the establishment of human rights protection system, including in criminal cases, requires a certain sequence of actions, it is important that the criminal process, there was no advantage to either side. The reconciliation of the parties, the protection of human rights and personal interests of the victim, civil plaintiff, suspect, accused or civil defendant should be the same, on an equal footing, since "all men are born free and equal in dignity and rights" (Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights)[5].




[1] Teyman S. plea bargain or reduced forms of justice: Russia`s scenario? / / Zh. Rossiyskaya justice. -1998. - № 10, p.35-37.
[2] So, for example, adopted in 1988 introduced the Italian Code of Criminal Procedure so-called declaration of the parties on the designation of punishment (Art. 444 - 448), which contributes to failure to judicial inquiry in cases where the threatened punishment of imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years. Just as in the Spanish konformidade, accused in the Italian deal (pattedzhamento) pleaded not guilty and the judge can justify it in case of lack of evidence. See: S. Teyman plea bargain or reduced forms of justice: which path Russia? / / G. Russian justice. -1998. - № 10. - P. 35-37; № 11. S. 35-37.
[3] Rybalov K. A reasonable compromise in the criminal process. / / J. Home lawyer. - 2005. - № 2. - C.2-3.
[4] Teyman S. plea bargain or reduced forms of justice: which path Russia? / / Russian justice. - 1998. - № 10. - S. 35-37; № 11. - S. 35-37.
[5] Azarov, A., Reuter V., K. Hüfner protection of human rights. Russian and international mechanisms. - M. Mezhd.shkola Human Rights, 2000. - S. 392.